Welcome to the reset of the newsletter, I’ve written enough of these that I’m not spending more than a couple sentences on the month and a half pause. I ran out of spoons to write this newsletter, my system failed, and now I have some metaphorical cutlery (and a plan to keep them). Cool? Cool.
Now to today’s topic: The overwhelm of simplification. Aren’t counterintuitive phrases fun!
There’s this funny thing that happens in the productivity content ecosystem where someone will create what they think is a simplification but which is, in fact, a visually or auditorily overwhelming practice in chaos. Take, for example, this post from CEO coach Eric Partaker. A whole pile of terms and an overwhelming image. This is not a slight aimed at Eric, this is just the way of the social media-sphere, but it doesn’t exactly give us hope when it comes to cripping productivity. Except, we can simplify, and some of it is already done for us.
Now, it would take someone more talented than me at graphic design to make the aforementioned graphic readable to your average consumer, but I can take a crack at expanding upon a more actionable version of the part of this post that is most important: the list of terms and concepts.
Here goes:
From a cripping productivity vantage point, I think we need to zero in on finding a way to review and a way to refocus. For example, I love watching YouTuber Christy Anne Jones’ videos. She’s an Australian author and content creator who has a series where she follows the writing routines of famous authors. In a recent edition, she followed Dan Brown’s which involves, among other things, a minute of push ups every hour.
If that works, great! But find the thing that refocuses you. For me, it’s petting one or both of the dogs that I share my office with. I find that planning once on Sunday evening and once on Wednesday evening is enough to get the big picture, and that following my to-do list in Notion keeps me on track just enough.
So, find the ways that you can plan and refocus, and stick to them as best you can, boiling it down to a number of minutes just sounds exceedingly neurotypical to me.
From a cripping productivity perspective, batching your tasks could mean grouping your medical appointment to-do list tasks or batching tasks together into low spoon, medium spoon, and high spoon activities.
For me, on days when I’m not freestyling my to-do list, usually high pain days, I pick three tasks. Now, because I’m me, I’m almost always exceeding those three tasks, but it gets me started, it builds momentum, and it gives me permission to stop. Cripping productivity, if it’s successful, is about giving us permission to start and permission to stop. Funny that a guy that doesn’t drive is about to give you a vehicle metaphor, but it’s about the freeway on and off ramps.
I have yet to do a deep dive into the GTD methodology, but cripping the GTD method, I think, is about having disability-friendly systems and tools to work with and through these stages. Not unlike many other productivity tools.
Cripping time blocking asks us to set aside time, and stick to that time, but not be scheduling every moment of the day. For many folks I’ve played sports with there are areas of the day that are already heavily time blocked (think: medical or care routines). Expanding that to your whole workday can be helpful, especially if you adore routine, but I think—to use a medical metaphor here—you need small doses. I’d recommend starting by time blocking a morning where you need to do minimal tasks and go from there.
I truly do believe in momentum and how it impacts crip productivity, but I’m not sure doing the hardest thing first is the best course of action from a disability perspective. This is going to sound very pessimistic, but we’re conditioned to think that we’re not allowed to see an email as a difficult thing or a sentence as a difficult thing.
Invariably, the frog in these analogies is used to describe some deep work and not, for example, confirming a calendar appointment. To borrow an educational term, I think scaffolding towards the hard thing is very valuable when it comes to crip productivity. For me, eating the frog is getting up earlier than the rest of the house. It’s a battle every time.
I actually find this one of the most crip-friendly concepts on this entire list. Having a gatekeeping procedure like this can really help reduce the amount of brainclutter that being productive in this world necessitates. The flipside of that, however, is learning that you can’t just identify everything as important. Particularly if your disability/a symptom of it—like mania or rejection sensitive dysphoria—has you believing everything is a five alarm fire.
A crip example of the 80/20 rule is related to a recent process that I’ve gone through automating a lot of my household tasks. I think I was so used to equating hard effort with good work that I didn’t do a good job of letting things be automatic. This meant that I saw value in logging in and buying dog food each month rather than just scheduling it. It took me many years to automate the little bit of investing I do (an RDSP, very disabled of me) because I felt like I needed to put in that effort in order for the results to have been earned.
I still follow this one, but I have reduced how much I believe in it from a cripping productivity perspective. On one hand, if I know I can write a pitch to a publication or an email to an editor in two minutes, I will do that. I value being as punctual as I can with those forms of communication. Where I’ve had to lessen my two minute rule following is on household tasks. Sure, I can do those dishes in two minutes, but that leads to doing the garbage in the next two minutes, and then sweeping the floor, and suddenly I’m shampooing the couch and reorganizing our wardrobe. For the two minute rule, if you don’t have an exit strategy, it can get you in trouble.
This sounds lovely, but in practice I’m not sure it works for a lot of disabled people. In the same way that an inclusive culture isn’t one where anything goes, an inclusive and accessible workflow needs some parameters, some guidelines, in order to be effective. I think flowtime can be helpful if your flow sessions are fairly consistent/predictable, but not if your relationship to time is very dynamic and frustrating.
Until tomorrow!
JL
I've decided to shift CRPL to a 5 times a week newsletter about productivity as I am fascinated by the topic, am in the early stage of writing a book about it, and want to have a place to think, and write, and create work about this vital area of thinking. Click below to join the daily newsletter and/or to help financially support this project.